Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1399537
| From | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? |
| Date | 2016-05-12 00:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxKkF-72-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rxCwP-Kt-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxCZR-1jh-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxDsS-1yk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxE5B-2n7-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxGqK-4tl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:19:07AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Well, I came to feel that this is caused by down_write_killable() bug. > > I guess we should fix down_write_killable() bug first. > > There's a patch you can try in that thread... > > lkml.kernel.org/r/20160511094128.GB3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net > OK. Applying that patch on next-20160511 seems to fix this problem. Please send it to linux-next tree. Thank you.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[next-20160506 mm,smp] hang up at csd_lock_wait() from drain_all_pages() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-06 13:00 +0200
x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-09 17:00 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-09 19:00 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-11 15:30 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 15:40 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-11 16:10 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-11 16:40 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-11 17:20 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 19:50 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-12 00:00 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-11 16:20 +0200
csiph-web