Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1399182
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? |
| Date | 2016-05-11 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxDsS-1yk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rwUP8-7Fi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rwWHh-16Q-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxCn9-F9-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxCwP-Kt-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rxCZR-1jh-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:19:16PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > [ 180.434659] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/31/2013 > > > > can you reproduce on real hardware? > > > Unfortunately, I don't have a real hardware to run development kernels. > > My Linux environment is limited to 4 CPUs / 1024MB or 2048MB RAM running > as a VMware guest on Windows. Can somebody try KVM environment with > 4 CPUs / 1024MB or 2048MB RAM whith partition only plain /dev/sda1 > formatted as XFS? Can you trigger a back trace on all cpus when the watchdog triggers? Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[next-20160506 mm,smp] hang up at csd_lock_wait() from drain_all_pages() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-06 13:00 +0200
x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-09 17:00 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-09 19:00 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-11 15:30 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 15:40 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-11 16:10 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-11 16:40 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-11 17:20 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-11 19:50 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2016-05-12 00:00 +0200
Re: x86_64 Question: Are concurrent IPI requests safe? Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-05-11 16:20 +0200
csiph-web