Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1390670
| From | Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually |
| Date | 2016-04-29 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rt4Dn-52y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <rsZaG-hy-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsZkm-mr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsZkn-mr-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rt1ma-2o0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rt1Fw-2Aw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:23:15PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 04:03:57PM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:55:27PM -0500, Nathan Sullivan wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:43:03PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > > I agree that is a valid fix for AT91, however it won't solve our problem, since
> > > > > > we have no children on the second ethernet MAC in our devices' device trees. I'm
> > > > > > starting to feel like our second MAC shouldn't even really register the MDIO bus
> > > > > > since it isn't being used - maybe adding a DT property to not have a bus is a
> > > > > > better option?
> > > > >
> > > > > status = "disabled"
> > > > >
> > > > > would be the unusual way.
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > Oh, sorry, I meant we use both MACs on Zynq, however the PHYs are on the MDIO
> > > > bus of the first MAC. So, the second MAC is used for ethernet but not for MDIO,
> > > > and so it does not have any PHYs under its DT node. It would be nice if there
> > > > were a way to tell macb not to bother with MDIO for the second MAC, since that's
> > > > handled by the first MAC.
> > >
> > > Yes, exactly, add support for status = "disabled" in the mdio node.
> >
> > Unfortunately, the 'macb' doesn't have a "mdio node", or alternatively:
> > the node representing the mdio bus is the same node which represents the
> > macb instance itself. Setting 'status = "disabled"' on this node will
> > just prevent the probing of the macb instance.
>
> :-(
>
> It is very common to have an mdio node within the MAC node, for example imx6sx-sdb.dtsi
Okay, I think that makes sense. I think, then, perhaps the solution to
our problem is to:
1. Modify the macb driver to support an 'mdio' node. (And adjust the
binding document accordingly). If the node is found, it's used for
of_mdiobus_register() w/o any of the manual scan madness.
2. For backwards compatibility, in the case where an 'mdio' node does
not exist, leave the existing behavior the way it is now
(of_mdiobus_register() followed by manual scan) [perhaps warn of
deprecation as well?]
3. Update binding docs to reflect the above.
In this way, for our usecase, the 'status = "disabled"' in the newly
created 'mdio' node isn't necessary. It's sufficient for the node to
exist and be empty.
> &fec1 {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_enet1>;
> phy-supply = <®_enet_3v3>;
> phy-mode = "rgmii";
> phy-handle = <ðphy1>;
> status = "okay";
>
> mdio {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> ethphy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
> reg = <1>;
> };
>
> ethphy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
> reg = <2>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> &fec2 {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_enet2>;
> phy-mode = "rgmii";
> phy-handle = <ðphy2>;
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> This even has the two phys on one bus, as you described...
Yep...looks nearly exactly the same case.
Thanks,
Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com> - 2016-04-28 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2016-04-28 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com> - 2016-04-28 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-04-28 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com> - 2016-04-28 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-04-28 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com> - 2016-04-28 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-04-28 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-04-28 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> - 2016-04-28 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-04-28 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> - 2016-04-29 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> - 2016-04-29 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-04-29 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2016-04-29 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-04-29 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> - 2016-05-02 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: macb: do not scan PHYs manually Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> - 2016-05-02 21:40 +0200
csiph-web