Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1388666

Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests

Show all headers | View raw

On 21/04/16 11:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 20/04/16 15:15, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> b4ff8389ed14 is incomplete: relies on nr_legacy_irqs() to get the number
>>> of legacy interrupts when actually nr_legacy_irqs() returns 0 after
>>> probe_8259A(). Use NR_IRQS_LEGACY instead.
>>
>> Would you mind describing the resulting problem?
> 
> This is a good question. The symptom is:
> 
> ata_piix: probe of 0000:00:01.1 failed with error -22
> 
> 
>> With this commit message I'm absolutely not capable to decide whether
>> e.g. the other use of nr_legacy_irqs() in pci_xen_initial_domain() is
>> correct or not.
> 
> I looked at it but I couldn't really test that code because if I try to
> change the number of ioapics in the system using the "noapic" command
> line option (which actually changes the number if ioapics, not lapics),
> I get an error from Linux saying that noapic is not supported when
> running on Xen.
> 
> In my opinion having nr_legacy_irqs() calls in Xen code, which returns
> 0, is like playing with fire. I think it would be safer/saner to replace
> them all with NR_IRQS_LEGACY, simply because reading the code one would
> not expect that all those loops don't actually have any iterations.

I'm quite sure you should change both uses of nr_legacy_irqs() in
pci_xen_initial_domain().

Looking at xen_pcifront_enable_irq() I'm not really sure what is the
correct thing to do.

Adding Konrad as he might have a better insight.


Juergen

> 
> However I didn't make the change because I couldn't test it properly.
> 
> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
>>> index beac4df..349b8ce 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
>>> @@ -491,8 +491,11 @@ int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
>>>  #endif
>>>  	__acpi_register_gsi = acpi_register_gsi_xen;
>>>  	__acpi_unregister_gsi = NULL;
>>> -	/* Pre-allocate legacy irqs */
>>> -	for (irq = 0; irq < nr_legacy_irqs(); irq++) {
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Pre-allocate the legacy IRQs.  Use NR_LEGACY_IRQS here
>>> +	 * because we don't have a PIC and thus nr_legacy_irqs() is zero.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	for (irq = 0; irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY; irq++) {
>>>  		int trigger, polarity;
>>>  
>>>  		if (acpi_get_override_irq(irq, &trigger, &polarity) == -1)
>>>
>>
> 
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-20 15:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-04-21 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV  guests Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-21 11:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-04-27 07:10 +0200
        Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts  on PV guests David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-04-27 11:40 +0200
          Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts  on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-27 15:40 +0200
            Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts  on PV guests David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-04-27 15:50 +0200
              Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts  on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-27 16:10 +0200
  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts  on PV guests Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> - 2016-04-21 13:10 +0200

csiph-web