Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1383964
| From | Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests |
| Date | 2016-04-21 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rqiMy-6KC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rq0cV-8rY-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 20/04/16 15:15, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> b4ff8389ed14 is incomplete: relies on nr_legacy_irqs() to get the number
> of legacy interrupts when actually nr_legacy_irqs() returns 0 after
> probe_8259A(). Use NR_IRQS_LEGACY instead.
Would you mind describing the resulting problem? With this commit
message I'm absolutely not capable to decide whether e.g. the other
use of nr_legacy_irqs() in pci_xen_initial_domain() is correct or
not.
Juergen
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> index beac4df..349b8ce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> @@ -491,8 +491,11 @@ int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
> #endif
> __acpi_register_gsi = acpi_register_gsi_xen;
> __acpi_unregister_gsi = NULL;
> - /* Pre-allocate legacy irqs */
> - for (irq = 0; irq < nr_legacy_irqs(); irq++) {
> + /*
> + * Pre-allocate the legacy IRQs. Use NR_LEGACY_IRQS here
> + * because we don't have a PIC and thus nr_legacy_irqs() is zero.
> + */
> + for (irq = 0; irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY; irq++) {
> int trigger, polarity;
>
> if (acpi_get_override_irq(irq, &trigger, &polarity) == -1)
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-20 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-04-21 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-04-21 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2016-04-27 07:10 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-04-27 11:40 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-27 15:40 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-04-27 15:50 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-04-27 16:10 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> - 2016-04-21 13:10 +0200
csiph-web