Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1389940
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() |
| Date | 2016-04-28 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rsQAp-Tg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rsj1L-6xe-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsQ7p-Ft-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rsQh3-Jd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > * Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > > > +#define memmove memmove > > > > Btw., what's the purpose of this define? If it's already defined then we should > > get a build warning. If it's not, we won't. > > It's for the decompressor that checks for memmove existing already via > "ifdef memmove". If this isn't done here, we will end up with two > memmove implementations. So: triton:~/tip> git grep memmove | grep -i ifdef triton:~/tip> what am I missing? > >> +void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n) > > > > btw., if there's any doubt about other overlapping uses, we could add this to > > memcpy(): > > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(dest > src && dest-src < n); > > > > or so? Does printk() work so early on? > > It does not, but we could use either "error" or the new "warn". Should > we abort a boot in this case, or just warn about it? (Our > implementations of memcpy, fwiw, currently seem to support overlap, so > I would suggest warn.) Yeah, I'd definitely not try to crash the bootup for the user, but try to continue. Thanks, Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-04-26 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-04-28 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-04-28 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-04-28 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-04-28 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-04-28 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-28 19:50 +0200
[tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: Rename overlapping memcpy() to memmove() tip-bot for Kees Cook <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-04-28 12:40 +0200
csiph-web