Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1383404

Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable
Date 2016-04-20 15:50 +0200
Message-ID <rq0FY-fr-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <rnoYa-7qk-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnp7Q-7vE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnphw-7zX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnqdA-8e7-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnsyK-1lV-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:49:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 13-04-16 12:27:31, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm testing your patches today, if they are otherwise OK [...]
> > 
> > got this build failure:
> > 
> >   ./arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h:106:2: error: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints
> 
> Hmm, I have no idea why 64b didn't have problem with the asm but 32b
> complains. Anyway, the following makes both happy. I have checked the
> generated code for 64b and it hasn't changed after the patch. 32b also
> seems to be generating a proper code. My gcc asm()-foo is rather weak so
> I would feel better if somebody double checked after me.

I completely blow at this gcc-asm constraints thing too :/

In any case, Ingo will you look after the rest of these patches, or do
you want me to pick up the remaining bits?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-20 15:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-04-20 20:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-20 22:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-20 23:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-04-20 23:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-20 23:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-04-21 00:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-21 13:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-21 15:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-21 15:30 +0200
            [PATCH] x86/locking/rwsem: Cleanup ____down_write() Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-27 14:10 +0200
              [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Clean up ____down_write() tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-04-28 12:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-22 09:00 +0200

csiph-web