Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1383404
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable |
| Date | 2016-04-20 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rq0FY-fr-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <rnoYa-7qk-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnp7Q-7vE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnphw-7zX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnqdA-8e7-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnsyK-1lV-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:49:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 13-04-16 12:27:31, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > I'm testing your patches today, if they are otherwise OK [...] > > > > got this build failure: > > > > ./arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h:106:2: error: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints > > Hmm, I have no idea why 64b didn't have problem with the asm but 32b > complains. Anyway, the following makes both happy. I have checked the > generated code for 64b and it hasn't changed after the patch. 32b also > seems to be generating a proper code. My gcc asm()-foo is rather weak so > I would feel better if somebody double checked after me. I completely blow at this gcc-asm constraints thing too :/ In any case, Ingo will you look after the rest of these patches, or do you want me to pick up the remaining bits?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-20 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-04-20 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-20 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-20 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-04-20 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-20 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-04-21 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-21 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-04-21 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-21 15:30 +0200
[PATCH] x86/locking/rwsem: Cleanup ____down_write() Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-04-27 14:10 +0200
[tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Clean up ____down_write() tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-04-28 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-22 09:00 +0200
csiph-web