Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1379669

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: qcom_spmi: Only use selector based regulator ops

From Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: qcom_spmi: Only use selector based regulator ops
Date 2016-04-15 12:20 +0200
Message-ID <ro910-1ni-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <riA3T-5P1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <riA3T-5P1-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[]...
  
>  static int spmi_regulator_select_voltage_same_range(struct spmi_regulator *vreg,
> -		int min_uV, int max_uV, u8 *range_sel, u8 *voltage_sel,
> -		unsigned *selector)
> +		int min_uV, int max_uV)
>  {
>  	const struct spmi_voltage_range *range;
>  	int uV = min_uV;
> -	int i;
> +	int i, selector;
>  
>  	range = spmi_regulator_find_range(vreg);
>  	if (!range)
> @@ -638,8 +665,8 @@ static int spmi_regulator_select_voltage_same_range(struct spmi_regulator *vreg,
>  	 * Force uV to be an allowed set point by applying a ceiling function to
>  	 * the uV value.
>  	 */
> -	*voltage_sel = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV, range->step_uV);
> -	uV = *voltage_sel * range->step_uV + range->min_uV;
> +	uV = DIV_ROUND_UP(uV - range->min_uV, range->step_uV);
> +	uV = uV * range->step_uV + range->min_uV;
>  
>  	if (uV > max_uV) {
>  		/*
> @@ -649,43 +676,49 @@ static int spmi_regulator_select_voltage_same_range(struct spmi_regulator *vreg,
>  		goto different_range;
>  	}
>  
> -	*selector = 0;
> +	selector = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i < vreg->set_points->count; i++) {
>  		if (uV >= vreg->set_points->range[i].set_point_min_uV
>  		    && uV <= vreg->set_points->range[i].set_point_max_uV) {
> -			*selector +=
> +			selector +=
>  			    (uV - vreg->set_points->range[i].set_point_min_uV)
>  				/ vreg->set_points->range[i].step_uV;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		*selector += vreg->set_points->range[i].n_voltages;
> +		selector += vreg->set_points->range[i].n_voltages;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (*selector >= vreg->set_points->n_voltages)
> +	if (selector >= vreg->set_points->n_voltages)
>  		goto different_range;
>  
>  	return 0;

This should now return selector instead of 0

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: qcom_spmi: Only use selector based  regulator ops Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-15 12:20 +0200
  [PATCH] regulator: qcom_spmi: Always return a selector when asked Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-04-15 19:50 +0200
    Applied "regulator: qcom_spmi: Always return a selector when asked" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-18 15:20 +0200

csiph-web