Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1379396
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] rxrpc: Don't permit use of connect() op and simplify sendmsg() op |
| Date | 2016-04-15 03:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ro0qK-2XM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rn870-W0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn871-W0-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:05:41 +0100 > Simplify the RxRPC user interface and remove the use of connect() to direct > client calls. It is redundant given that sendmsg() can be given the target > address and calls to multiple targets are permitted from a client socket > and also from a service socket. You can't just change completely the socket semantics for your protocol like this, every single userland application is going to break. Sorry, there is no way I am applying changes like this.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] RxRPC: 2nd rewrite part 2 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-04-12 17:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/3] rxrpc: The RXRPC_ACCEPT control message should not have an address David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-04-12 17:10 +0200
[PATCH 1/3] rxrpc: Don't permit use of connect() op and simplify sendmsg() op David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-04-12 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] rxrpc: Don't permit use of connect() op and simplify sendmsg() op David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-04-15 03:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] rxrpc: Don't permit use of connect() op and simplify sendmsg() op David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-04-15 05:30 +0200
csiph-web