Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask.

From	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask.
Date	2016-04-13 14:50 +0200
Message-ID	<rnsp4-1ia-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rnrt0-BH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnrt0-BH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnsp4-1ia-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
> 
> > +SYSCALL_DEFINE0(getumask)
> > +{
> > +	return current->fs->umask;
> > +}
> 
> The convention seems to be to call current_umask(), instead of
> inlining its contents.

Yes, please use existing.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 1/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask. "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> - 2016-04-13 13:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask. Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2016-04-13 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask. Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 14:50 +0200

csiph-web