Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1379316

Re: [PATCH] efi: Use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL

From Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] efi: Use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL
Date 2016-04-15 00:00 +0200
Message-ID <rnXsR-ux-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rmHJv-4qq-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 11 Apr, at 04:23:29PM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> Function dup_variable_bug is called inside the spinlock.
> This may lead to issues when kzalloc sleeps, so it is
> better to use GFP_ATOMIC in this spinlocked context.
> 
> Problem found using Coccinelle.
 
Dang it, I broke coccinelle ;)

> Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
> index 0ac594c..d5e2f28 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
> @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static void dup_variable_bug(efi_char16_t *str16, efi_guid_t *vendor_guid,
>  	 */
>  	efivar_wq_enabled = false;
>  
> -	str8 = kzalloc(len8, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	str8 = kzalloc(len8, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (!str8)
>  		return;
>  

This was brought up by Saurabh last year,

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446003747-3760-1-git-send-email-saurabh.truth@gmail.com

dup_variable_bug() is never called while holding the spinlock in
practice, and I'm guessing Coccinelle cannot understand that because
it'd need to look at program control flow, across multiple compilation
units.

If anyone wants to send a patch to clean up the EFI code so that it's
easier for coccinelle to check it, I'd be happy to review it.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] efi: Use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com> - 2016-04-11 13:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] efi: Use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-04-15 00:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] efi: Use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-04-15 08:40 +0200

csiph-web