Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1378373

Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler

From Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler
Date 2016-04-14 02:50 +0200
Message-ID <rnDDP-1uB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rlEb0-3RN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlEb1-3RN-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnqQh-jn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnsS7-1JU-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rnt1M-1O6-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > On 04/13/2016 04:05 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:53:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart
> >>> directly. This enables support for replacing the PSCI restart handler
> >>> with a different handler if necessary for a specific board.
> >>>
> >>> Select a priority of 129 to indicate a higher than default priority, but
> >>> keep it as low as possible since PSCI reset is known to fail on some
> >>> boards.
> >>
> >> For reference, which boards?
> >>
> > Salvator-X, reported by Geert Uytterhoeven. Wolfram Sang also reported
> > that it is broken on a board he is using, but I don't recall if it is
> > the same board.
> 
> Yes it is.
> 
> >> It's unfortunate that that a PSCI 0.2+ implementation would be lacking a
> >> working SYSTEM_RESET implementation, and it's certainly a mistake to
> >> discourage.
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>> ---
> >>> It might make sense to introduce a restart-priority property for
> >>> devicetree
> >>> based configurations, but I am not sure if this would be acceptable.
> >>
> >>> From the DT side, I'm not keen on properties for priorities. They're
> >> incredibly fragile and don't really encode a HW property.
> >>
> > Depends. It is a convenient means to say "primary restart method" or
> > "may be broken".
> 
> The issue is supposed to be fixed in a more recent firmware, which I still have
> to try.
> 
> DT indeed isn't the right place to work around this. What we need is a
> blacklist of bad firmware versions...
> Or Perfect Firmware from Day One on (like Perfect DT from Day One ;-)
> 
That makes things quite tricky. Best I can think of is a series of boolean
devicetree properties, such as

	broken-reset-handler
	last-resort-restart-handler
	secondary-restart-handler
	default-restart-handler
	primary-restart-handler

which ends up being quite similar to the 'restart-priority' property. I'll
do this as follow-up patch, though - I do not see the point holding up the
series for this, and it is really a separate problem. I'll send rev2 with
the various Acked-by: and Reviewed-by: tags as well as the variable rename
suggested by Wolfram.

Thanks,
Guenter

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/6] ARM/ARM64: Drop arm_pm_restart Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-08 15:00 +0200
  [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-08 15:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-12 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-04-13 13:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> - 2016-04-13 13:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-13 15:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-04-13 15:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-14 02:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-14 11:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-14 15:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: PSCI: Register with kernel restart handler Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-14 16:40 +0200
  [PATCH 1/6] ARM: prima2: Register with kernel restart handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-08 15:00 +0200
  [PATCH 6/6] ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-08 15:00 +0200
  [PATCH 4/6] ARM: Register with kernel restart handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-08 15:00 +0200
  [PATCH 5/6] ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-04-08 15:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-04-12 15:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM/ARM64: Drop arm_pm_restart Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-08 17:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM/ARM64: Drop arm_pm_restart Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-08 22:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM/ARM64: Drop arm_pm_restart Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-04-12 17:50 +0200

csiph-web