Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1373803
| From | Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 30/46] regulator: pwm: retrieve correct voltage |
| Date | 2016-04-08 00:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rlq82-1KE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <riuBc-28V-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <riuBd-28V-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <rivQC-2TZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Mark, On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:24:10 -0700 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:53PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > The continuous PWM voltage regulator is caching the voltage value in > > the ->volt_uV field. While most of the time this value should reflect the > > real voltage, sometime it can be sightly different if the PWM device > > rounded the set_duty_cycle request. > > Moreover, this value is not valid until someone has modified the regulator > > output. > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Actually this patch introduces a bug (reported by Stephen): " I applied your patch series [PATCH v5 00/46] pwm: add support for atomic update and found a null pointer dereference when probing a pwm-regulator at boot. See the below stack trace: [ 4.282374] [<ffffffc000399088>] pwm_regulator_get_voltage+0x78/0xa0 [ 4.289344] [<ffffffc000390740>] regulator_attr_is_visible+0x7c/0x264 [ 4.296408] [<ffffffc0001f75a0>] internal_create_group+0x14c/0x280 [ 4.303184] [<ffffffc0001f76e8>] sysfs_create_group+0x14/0x1c [ 4.309483] [<ffffffc0001f77c8>] sysfs_create_groups+0x30/0x78 [ 4.315881] [<ffffffc00043631c>] device_add+0x224/0x4d8 [ 4.321609] [<ffffffc0004365ec>] device_register+0x1c/0x28 [ 4.327623] [<ffffffc0003952a4>] regulator_register+0x2e4/0xc14 [ 4.334112] [<ffffffc000396844>] devm_regulator_register+0x54/0x94 [ 4.340887] [<ffffffc000399328>] pwm_regulator_probe+0x278/0x2b8 [ 4.347473] [<ffffffc000439fe4>] platform_drv_probe+0x58/0xa4 [ 4.353772] [<ffffffc0004387a8>] driver_probe_device+0x114/0x2ac [ 4.360358] [<ffffffc0004389a4>] __driver_attach+0x64/0x90 [ 4.366371] [<ffffffc000436f50>] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0x90 [ 4.372478] [<ffffffc000438bd4>] driver_attach+0x20/0x28 [ 4.378299] [<ffffffc00043778c>] bus_add_driver+0xe8/0x1e0 [ 4.384312] [<ffffffc00043959c>] driver_register+0x98/0xe4 [ 4.390326] [<ffffffc00043aa04>] __platform_driver_register+0x48/0x50 [ 4.397388] [<ffffffc000cb2710>] pwm_regulator_driver_init+0x18/0x20 [ 4.404356] [<ffffffc000c8ca7c>] do_one_initcall+0xf8/0x180 [ 4.410466] [<ffffffc000c8cc58>] kernel_init_freeable+0x154/0x1f4 [ 4.417148] [<ffffffc000929cf4>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 [ 4.422782] [<ffffffc000084450>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40 It looks like the root cause is that regulator_attr_is_visible will try to get the voltage, but at this point in regulator_register, rdev->constraints is still null. So pwm_duty_cycle_percentage_to_voltage will dereference a null rdev->constraints pointer. " The problem is that we need to know the min and max voltage constraints to calculate the current voltage. ->get_voltage() is called when the sysfs attributes are created (part of device registration), and set_machine_constraints() is called after device_register(), thus leading to the NULL pointer dereference. Is there any reason for calling set_machine_constraints() after device_register() in regulator_register()? Best Regards, Boris
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v5 30/46] regulator: pwm: retrieve correct voltage Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-04-08 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 30/46] regulator: pwm: retrieve correct voltage Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 06:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 30/46] regulator: pwm: retrieve correct voltage Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-04-12 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 30/46] regulator: pwm: retrieve correct voltage Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 30/46] regulator: pwm: retrieve correct voltage Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-04-12 12:40 +0200
csiph-web