Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1374260

Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on big endian

From Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on big endian
Date 2016-04-08 17:00 +0200
Message-ID <rlG37-5o2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <rkOm5-7DR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkSg1-1O6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkUBc-3Dr-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlho6-3Mb-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlhR7-4fL-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


2016-04-07 15:07 GMT+01:00 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>:
> On (04/07/16 13:33), Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> [..]
>> Hi again, Sergey
>
> Hello,
>
>> Thanks for the patch, I'll test it as soon as possible. I agree with
>> your second option, usually one selects lz4 when (especially
>> decompression) speed is paramount, so it needs all the help it can
>> get.
>
> thanks!
>
>> Speaking of fishy, the 64-bit detection code also looks suspiciously
>> bogus. Some of the identifiers don't even exist anywhere in the kernel
>> (__ppc64__, por example, after grepping all .c and .h files).
>> Shouldn't we instead check for CONFIG_64BIT or BITS_PER_LONG == 64?
>
> definitely a good question. personally, I'd prefer to test for
> CONFIG_64BIT only, looking at this hairy
>
>   /* Detects 64 bits mode */
>   #if (defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__x86_64) || defined(__amd64__) \
>          || defined(__ppc64__) || defined(__LP64__))
>
> and remove/rewrite a bunch of other stuff. but the thing with cleanups
> is that they don't fix anything, while potentially can introduce bugs.
> it's more risky to touch the stable code. /* well, removing those 'ghost'
> identifiers is sort of OK to me */. but that's just my opinion, I'll
> leave it to you and Greg.
>
>         -ss

Hi again, Sergey

I finally was able to test your patch but, as I suspected, it wasn't
enough. However, based on it, I was able to write a (hopefully)
correct one, which I'll send soon (tested on ppc64, with no
regressions on x86_64).

Thanks,

Rui

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on big endian Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 16:10 +0200
  Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on  big endian Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-04-05 17:40 +0200
    Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on big endian Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 18:10 +0200
      Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on  big endian Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:40 +0200
        Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on big endian Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:50 +0200
          Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on  big endian Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 14:20 +0200
            Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on big endian Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 14:40 +0200
              Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on  big endian Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 15:10 +0200
                Re: [BUG] lib: zram lz4 compression/decompression still broken on big endian Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 17:00 +0200

csiph-web