Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1372807
| From | Aniroop Mathur <aniroop.mathur@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data |
| Date | 2016-04-06 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rl2yK-16I-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <rjxdE-70V-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkX61-5pE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkZAT-7uO-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rl0ZX-aA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rl1Mm-uH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Mr. Henrik, On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org> wrote: > Hi Aniroop, > >>> I am not sure what the urgency is. It is more of a theoretical problem >>> ans so far the proposed solutions were actually introducing more >>> problems than they were solving. >>> >>> I am sorry, bit this particular topic is not a priority for me. >>> >> >> There is no hurry at all. :-) As you know request is made a long time ago, >> so I am only very curious to complete it. > > This kind of patch is not liked by any maintainer, because it does not solve any > immediate problem, but instead may create one. If such a simple patch takes > three of four tries to look right, it only adds to the perception that the code > is best left alone. > > I think the solution at this stage is to say no to this patch. > > If there is ever a driver for which the input_estimate_events_per_packet() > function returns less than the actual maximum number of events per frame, this > issue can be revisited and resolved in a number of different ways. > > Sorry, and thanks for your work. > Well, I agree this code might not be used by any driver so far. But if some driver developer writes such a driver, then it definitely cannot work well because of the bug in input subsystem code. So I am afraid that it is not a good idea to wait for someone to report this bug when we already know that the bug does exist in input core. Secondly, I submitted this patch not only because it breaks protocol of SYN_REPORT event but also because without this bug fix, another bug could not be concluded which depends on when the input event packet ended really. Bug: Input: evdev: fix bug of dropping valid packet after syn_dropped event https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8083641/ So to fix this bug, we need to fix SYN_REPORT bug first. It would be appreciating of you if you could give it one more spin. > Henrik >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data Aniroop Mathur <aniroop.mathur@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 19:10 +0200
[PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@samsung.com> - 2016-04-04 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data Aniroop Mathur <aniroop.mathur@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data Aniroop Mathur <aniroop.mathur@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org> - 2016-04-06 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Input: Do not add SYN_REPORT in between a single packet data Aniroop Mathur <aniroop.mathur@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 22:50 +0200
csiph-web