Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1371323
| From | Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Update gpio chip operations |
| Date | 2016-04-05 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkuQq-pb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rj4Y2-35K-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rj4Y3-35K-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkdmA-47v-57@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:08:47PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Cristina Ciocan > <cristina.ciocan@intel.com> wrote: > > > This patch updates the gpio chip implementation in order to interact with > > the pin control model: the chip contains reference to SOC data and > > pin/group/community information is retrieved through the SOC reference. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristina Ciocan <cristina.ciocan@intel.com> > > Patch applied with Mika's ACK. Thanks! > Cristina & Mika, can you provide feedback on a patch I sent last week: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=145864063724362&w=2 > > This makes it possible for a GPIO driver to use native > open drain if the hardware supports this instead of relying > on switching the pin to input and thus expecting high impedance. Looks like a good idea to me. Recent Intel hardware (Skylake, Broxton) is capable of taking advantage of this. Not sure if Baytrail supports this at hardware level, though. > With a backing pin control driver I think that maybe we need > a pin control back-end performing things like this on behalf > of the GPIO driver, something like > pinctrl_gpio_set_config(unsigned gpio, enum pin_config_param param, > u16 argument); > > So the pin controller can perform config on behalf of the > GPIO driver (e.g. setting a backing pin to open drain). > > Do you think we will need this? If I understand this right, GPIO part of the pinctrl driver just calls pinctrl_gpio_set_config() with correct parameters in its ->set_single_ended() to get the pin to the right mode. So yes, I think we could use it, at least from Intel pinctrl/GPIO drivers perspective :)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Update gpio chip operations Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-04-04 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Update gpio chip operations Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-05 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] pinctrl: baytrail: Update gpio chip operations Cristina Ciocan <cristina.ciocan@intel.com> - 2016-04-05 11:20 +0200
csiph-web