Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1372102
| From | Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs |
| Date | 2016-04-06 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkJPs-3T2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rkDTJ-8d1-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkJw5-3LU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkJFM-3PD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkJFM-3PD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkJPs-3T2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:41:47PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:36:04PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:30:07PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote: > > > this one: > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145926976808760&w=2 > > > > Ah. that patch won't actually fix the bug, since md isn't using > > blk_default_limits, it's using blk_set_stacking_limits(). > > Not really, the limit is set by under layer disk not md, otherwise it > should be BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS, but the reported bio has 2560 sectors. > blk_set_stacking_limits() will use it. What? Well, that could should just be deleted, there's no reason anymore for md to care about the queue limits of the devices underneath it. Regardless, using BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS to limit # of pages in the biovec is _crazy_. Why would you even do that? We have a separate field in queue limits for # max segments, use it.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-05 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> - 2016-04-05 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 03:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> - 2016-04-06 03:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> - 2016-04-06 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> - 2016-04-06 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> - 2016-04-06 03:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 04:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-06 03:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> - 2016-04-07 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> - 2016-04-07 03:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-07 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> - 2016-04-07 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-07 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> - 2016-04-08 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256 bvecs Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2016-04-08 02:30 +0200
csiph-web