Groups > linux.kernel > #1371964

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled

From	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled
Date	2016-04-05 23:30 +0200
Message-ID	<rkGHV-1Ji-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rfrgu-2yM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfrgv-2yM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkDTJ-8d1-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkGHU-1Ji-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 16:21 -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> > > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> > > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are
> > > > managed remotely
> > > > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes.
> > > > So skip the bam_init
> > > > for any such platform if DT property is set.
> > > > 
> > > > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C
> > > > boards.
> > > > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA
> > > > controller.
> > > 
> > > I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first.
> > 
> > was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an
> > update in
> > my queue
> 
> No updates that I can see.  The original is here:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/113
> 

And that seemed to have some discussion so I dont recall looking at it. 

-- 
~Vinod

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-04-05 20:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2016-04-05 23:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-04-05 23:30 +0200

csiph-web