Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1371953
| From | Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled |
| Date | 2016-04-05 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkGHU-1Ji-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rfrgu-2yM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfrgv-2yM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkDTJ-8d1-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote: > > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely > > > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the bam_init > > > for any such platform if DT property is set. > > > > > > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C boards. > > > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA controller. > > > > I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first. > > was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an update in > my queue No updates that I can see. The original is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/113
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-04-05 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> - 2016-04-05 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-04-05 23:30 +0200
csiph-web