Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1371780
| From | luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v2 1/7] Track the active utilisation |
| Date | 2016-04-05 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkCkX-70h-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rj91E-6gd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rj9bk-6jH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkyhl-3jr-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Peter, first of all, thanks for all the reviews! On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:23:27 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: [...] > > @@ -1218,6 +1242,9 @@ static void task_dead_dl(struct task_struct *p) > > /* XXX we should retain the bw until 0-lag */ > > dl_b->total_bw -= p->dl.dl_bw; > > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&dl_b->lock); > > + > > + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) > > + sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); > > } > > > > A dead task cannot be running, not be queued, right? ISTR you remove > this hunk in a later patch as well. I suspect this is some "better safe than sorry" code I added trying to solve some issue that then I solved in a different way... But I forgot to remove it. I'll fix the patch and re-test. Thanks, Luca
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC v2 1/7] Track the active utilisation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-04-05 14:30 +0200 Re: [RFC v2 1/7] Track the active utilisation luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> - 2016-04-05 18:50 +0200
csiph-web