Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1370378

RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle

From "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle
Date 2016-04-04 08:20 +0200
Message-ID <rk61H-7nU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <rjvOx-5Qg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rjxnk-74U-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rjyt4-7PW-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rjVzk-83s-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rk55F-6H0-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016.03.04 22:14 Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> wrote:
>> On 2016.04.02 11:21 Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Jörg Otte wrote:
>>>> 2016-04-02 17:28 GMT+02:00 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>>>>

> are you involved in the Ubuntu-OS? Developer for Canonical?

I try to help with Ubuntu as a community volunteer.
I am not a developer with Canonical.

... [cut]...

>> As far as I know the /etc/init.d/ondemand is working properly. It sets the acpi-cpufreq
>> driver to use the "ondemand" governor and it sets the intel_pstate driver to use the
>> "powersave" governor.
>>

> I haven't looked at this exactly.
> The ondemand-script is not saying to fall back to "powersave" in case
> of intel_pstate-driver (here on Ubuntu/precise).

It is likely that newer versions of /etc/init.d/ondemand script
were never backported to the older 12.04 precise release.
Why not? Well, because, as far as I know, that release never used the
intel_pstate driver by default and so never had to fall through
to the powersave alternative.

Earlier on this thread, Srinivas correctly asked Jörg what distribution
was being used, so as to hopefully make it easier to reproduce the issue.
If we want to continue this distro specific conversation, perhaps
we should move it off-list or to some Ubuntu specific forum.

... Doug

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-31 00:20 +0200
  Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> - 2016-03-31 00:30 +0200
    Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-31 00:50 +0200
      Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> - 2016-03-31 01:20 +0200
        Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 01:30 +0200
          Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 01:40 +0200
            Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 01:50 +0200
              Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle "Navin P.S" <navinp1912@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 09:30 +0200
  RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-03-31 01:00 +0200
    Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-31 01:20 +0200
    Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 10:20 +0200
      RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-03-31 16:40 +0200
        Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 08:20 +0200
          Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-02 17:40 +0200
            Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 19:20 +0200
              Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 20:30 +0200
                RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-04-03 21:10 +0200
                Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 07:20 +0200
                RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-04-04 08:20 +0200
                Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high  even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 16:20 +0200

csiph-web