Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1367670
| From | Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle |
| Date | 2016-03-31 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rixSq-4h4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <riwMF-3wm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rix61-3Fi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rixz4-46F-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rixIK-4bU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rixIK-4bU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Pandruvada, Srinivas >> <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:46 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 00:25 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On 3/31/2016 12:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Hi, >>>> > > > >>>> > > > I am using Intel-PState-Driver here with v4.6-rc1 and Intel- >>>> > > > SandyBridge-CPU. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Here are my turbostat results attached. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > $ cd $BUILD_DIR >>>> > > > $ LC_ALL=C make -C tools/ turbostat >>>> > > > >>>> > > > $ sudo ./turbostat -i 1 --msr=0x199 --debug --out >>>> > > > /tmp/turbostat-i-1-msr-0x199-debug.txt >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Will try <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8702071/>. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Please see attached files. >>>> > > > >>>> > > Thanks. Your logs make sense. You have config set to performance >>>> > > mode >>>> > > by default (Which I believe default in all kernel Ubuntu). So as >>>> > > expected Intel P state was asking for max. So there is no issue >>>> > > here. >>>> > But the behavior is different from what it used to be, isn't it? >>>> > > > [cut] > >> >> Too much questions. > > OK > >> I switched to CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE=y and tested with >> the simplified revert-patch of Rafael. > > Why do you need the revert patch in the first place? I simply wanted to test CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE=y and keep the rest. - Sedat -
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-31 00:20 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> - 2016-03-31 00:30 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-31 00:50 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> - 2016-03-31 01:20 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 01:30 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 01:40 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-31 01:50 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Navin P.S" <navinp1912@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 09:30 +0200
RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-03-31 01:00 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-31 01:20 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 10:20 +0200
RE: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2016-03-31 16:40 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 08:20 +0200
Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-02 17:40 +0200
csiph-web