Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1369549
| From | "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef |
| Date | 2016-04-01 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rjcLU-sT-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rj6ZQ-4O4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rj8fg-5EH-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rjciS-8u7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Apr 1, 2016, at 2:44 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 14:23 +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote: >>> >>> Question about removing lustre typedefs. >>> >>> Various bits of lustre code use a mix of struct foo and foo_t. >>> >>> When would be an appropriate time to submit patches similar to >>> below that individually remove various typedefs from lustre code? >> I think now is as good time as any. >> the only small correction is those are LNet typedefs. >> While LNet is technically part of Lustre, it's a bit of a separate >> thing useful without Lustre too. >> >> I know James is working on cleaning up LNet, but I don't know if he has >> anything this would be conflicting at this moment or not. >> >> Thanks for the patches. I wonder if you are generating them automatically? >> Because it would be great if it also fixes the alignment issues > > It's pretty automatic. > > It's a trivial variant of the detypedef perl script I wrote awhile ago: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.driver-project.devel/18603 > > > I think changing the alignment issues is better done in a > separate patch. but then it's two patches per change in a way. fixing one thing breaking the other warning-wise, that's why I typically try to make such cleanup patches not to introduce any new warnings. > > James isn't cc'd on these patches as he's not a listed > maintainer. Maybe he should be added for all of it or > some part of it? > for drivers/staging/lustre/lnet for the drivers/staging/lustre/lustre - the only remaining few typedefs I am going to address, it's just some of the code using them will go away or change the users significantly - that's why they were left out in the first round of lustre detypedefisation. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-01 15:10 +0200
[RFC PATCH 2/3] staging: lustre: Remove typedef lnd_t Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-01 15:10 +0200
[RFC PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre: Remove typedef lnet_peer_t Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-01 15:10 +0200
[RFC PATCH 3/3] staging: lustre: Remove typedef lnet_msg_t Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-01 15:10 +0200
Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com> - 2016-04-01 16:30 +0200
Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-01 20:50 +0200
Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com> - 2016-04-01 21:20 +0200
Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-01 21:30 +0200
Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-04-01 22:00 +0200
Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypede James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-04-01 22:10 +0200
RE: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef "Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@ornl.gov> - 2016-04-01 18:00 +0200
Re: [lustre-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: detypedef Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-04-01 21:00 +0200
csiph-web