Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1364712
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" |
| Date | 2016-03-25 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rgBns-36A-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rgjAf-7ve-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgxWx-Rf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgzbZ-1Ed-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 02:31:47PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > I agree, but the subsystem name is found in the name of the reverted commit. That doesn't help if it's not at the start of the subject line of the e-mail. > Do you ask me to resumbit the change changing the subject to > 'regulator: core: Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharg > configuration"'? Well, I applied it already so no but in future yes, reverts are patches like any other and should follow exactly the same process.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> - 2016-03-24 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-25 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> - 2016-03-25 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-25 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> - 2016-03-25 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-25 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> - 2016-03-25 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-25 19:20 +0100
Applied "regulator: core: Remove duplicate copy of active-discharge parsing" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-25 17:50 +0100
csiph-web