Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1363389
| From | oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support |
| Date | 2016-03-23 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfQ5c-3jc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rfv0J-5cK-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfv0J-5cK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfzH4-h4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016/3/23 2:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 + >> drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig | 10 + > > To fit in with the other drivers drop the hisilicon level > of the directory hierarchy. > > Haven't had time to look at the actual driver yet so far, though. > > . > Hi Christoph Hellwig, surely, I considered that other drivers will be put into the hisilicon level of the directory hierarchy. These drivers will support RDMA function which will be developed for a series of hisilicon chip. Because of the consideration, I drop the level. In additon that, i thought that the patch of RoCE driver which supported the base function of RDMA is huge. However, It is not splitted into patches in form of patchset. I don't put a better strategy that it neither make mistakes of building and running nor huge. thanks Lijun Ou
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v4 0/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-22 15:00 +0100
[PATCH v4 3/3] IB/hns: Add binding document for HiSilicon RoCE driver Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-22 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-03-22 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-23 13:30 +0100
csiph-web