Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1360541
| From | Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single |
| Date | 2016-03-18 12:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <re0Lo-4Z2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rdOhc-4TJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdP3B-5d9-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdPmW-5Fn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdPZE-5Wl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdZ2W-3Jq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 18/03/16 09:30, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:50:20 +0000 > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:17:24PM -0400, okaya@codeaurora.org wrote: >>> What is the correct way? I don't want to write engine->sram_dma = sram >> >> Well, what the driver _is_ wanting to do is to go from a CPU physical >> address to a device DMA address. phys_to_dma() looks like the correct >> thing there to me, but I guess that's just an offset and doesn't take >> account of any IOMMU that may be in the way. >> >> If you have an IOMMU, then the whole phys_to_dma() thing is a total >> failure as it only does a linear translation, and there are no >> interfaces in the kernel to take account of an IOMMU in the way. So, >> it needs something designed for the job, implemented and discussed by >> the normal methods of proposing a new cross-arch interface for drivers >> to use. >> >> What I'm certain of, though, is that the change proposed in this patch >> will break current users of this driver: virt_to_page() on an address >> returned by ioremap() is completely undefined, and will result in >> either a kernel oops, or if not poking at memory which isn't a struct >> page, ultimately resulting in something that isn't SRAM being pointed >> to by "engine->sram_dma". >> > > Or we could just do > > engine->sram_dma = res->start; > > which is pretty much what the SRAM/genalloc code is doing already. As Russell points out this is yet another type of "set up a DMA master to access something other than kernel RAM" - there's already discussion in progress over how to handle this for dmaengine slaves[1], so gathering more use-cases might help distil exactly what the design of not-strictly-DMA-but-so-closely-coupled-it-can't-really-live-anywhere-else needs to be. Robin. [1]:http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-March/414422.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-17 23:10 +0100
[PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: prefix dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma functions Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-17 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: prefix dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma functions Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-03-18 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: prefix dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma functions Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-18 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: prefix dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma functions Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org> - 2016-03-28 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: prefix dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma functions Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-03-29 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: prefix dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma functions Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-29 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: prefix dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma functions Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-29 21:40 +0200
[PATCH 3/3] dma-mapping: move swiotlb dma-phys functions to common header Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-17 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dma-mapping: move swiotlb dma-phys functions to common header Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-03-18 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] dma-mapping: move swiotlb dma-phys functions to common header Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-18 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-03-18 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single okaya@codeaurora.org - 2016-03-18 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-03-18 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-18 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2016-03-18 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-18 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-18 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-18 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-18 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: marvell/cesa - replace dma_to_phys with dma_map_single Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-18 15:30 +0100
csiph-web