Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1359597
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() |
| Date | 2016-03-17 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rdzLc-3CY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rbHa9-7jY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcQuJ-6Fh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcW78-1Xi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdbzd-3NJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdjwK-YM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 16-03-16, 14:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> No, it won't. This might be applicable to other governors, but not to
> "performance" (look at what it does on _START instead of just
> guessing).
>
> > So, your patch break things for sure.
>
> I'm not actually sure it breaks anything.
>
> Theoretically, it may, but practically? Is there any system out there
> where it makes any difference?
AFAIU, this patch will break currently working governors.
-> cpufreq_resume()
-> cpufreq_governor_performance(START)
-> __cpufreq_driver_target(target_freq = policy->max)
//policy->cur is already set to policy->max before suspend.
if (target_freq == policy->cur)
return 0;
And so, the real frequency stays to 500 MHz and policy->cur contains 1 GHz.
--
viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-12 03:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-15 07:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-15 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-16 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-16 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-16 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-17 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-16 05:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-16 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Do not schedule policy update work in cpufreq_resume() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-03-17 07:40 +0100
csiph-web