Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1359094

Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size"

From Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size"
Date 2016-03-16 16:30 +0100
Message-ID <rdlyz-2jP-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rdgpb-7eq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdgyS-7xF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdjn4-Vw-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdksP-1C9-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Why do you need your own defconfig? If it's just on the short term until
> all your code is upstream, that's fine, but this goes against the single
> Image aim. I would like defconfig to cover all supported SoCs (and yes,
> ACPI on by default once we deem it !EXPERT anymore), though at some
> point we may need a server/mobile split (if the generated image is too
> large, maybe more stuff being built as modules).

Yes, that's exactly it.  Ours is an ACPI system, and so we have to have 
our own defconfig for now.  We're holding off on pushing our own 
defconfig changes (enabling drivers, etc) until ACPI is enabled in 
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig.

My understanding is that ACPI won't be enabled by default until at least 
after the GIC driver is fully ACPI-enabled.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-16 14:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 15:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 15:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 16:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 15:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-16 16:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-17 15:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-17 16:00 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-17 16:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-03-17 17:10 +0100

csiph-web