Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size"

From	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size"
Date	2016-03-17 15:30 +0100
Message-ID	<rdH61-6P-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rdgpb-7eq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdgyS-7xF-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdjn4-Vw-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdksP-1C9-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rdlyz-2jP-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:26:08AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >Why do you need your own defconfig? If it's just on the short term until
> >all your code is upstream, that's fine, but this goes against the single
> >Image aim. I would like defconfig to cover all supported SoCs (and yes,
> >ACPI on by default once we deem it !EXPERT anymore), though at some
> >point we may need a server/mobile split (if the generated image is too
> >large, maybe more stuff being built as modules).
> 
> Yes, that's exactly it.  Ours is an ACPI system, and so we have to have our
> own defconfig for now.  We're holding off on pushing our own defconfig
> changes (enabling drivers, etc) until ACPI is enabled in
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig.

Is there anything that prevents you from providing a dtb/dts for this
SoC?

-- 
Catalin

Thread

[PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-16 14:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 15:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 15:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 16:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-16 15:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-16 16:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-17 15:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-17 16:00 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-17 16:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-03-17 17:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-03-17 19:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-17 19:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" "Chalamarla, Tirumalesh" <Tirumalesh.Chalamarla@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-03-18 22:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 03:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-21 18:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-03-21 18:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" "Chalamarla, Tirumalesh" <Tirumalesh.Chalamarla@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-03-21 18:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-21 18:40 +0100

csiph-web