Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1357830

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14

From Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14
Date 2016-03-15 07:50 +0100
Message-ID <rcQXM-6S7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rcuue-8R-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcL21-2Nm-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:30:29AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (03/14/16 17:40), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20160311:
> > 
> > The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I also applied a
> > patch for a known runtime bug.
> > 
> > The tip tree gained a conflict against the mips tree.
> > 
> > The aio tree still had a build failure so I removed several commits
> > from it.  It also gained a conflict against the vfs tree.
> > 
> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11202
> >  8646 files changed, 426680 insertions(+), 211740 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm seeing a bunch of warnings and errors

I pushed the fix to my for-next branch yesterday. Sorry for the fuzz!

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-14 07:50 +0100
  Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-14 15:40 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - 2016-03-14 18:00 +0100
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-14 20:20 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-03-15 01:00 +0100
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-15 03:40 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-15 06:30 +0100
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 23:00 +0100
        Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-16 01:20 +0100
          Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-16 14:30 +0100
            Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:30 +0100
              Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:20 +0100
                Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-17 03:20 +0100
                Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-17 03:40 +0100
                Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-17 13:50 +0100
  Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 01:30 +0100
    Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-03-15 07:50 +0100
      Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 08:00 +0100

csiph-web