Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1357770
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 |
| Date | 2016-03-15 03:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rcN3R-459-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rcuue-8R-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcBP3-4Xz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcKz0-2iI-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/14/2016 04:55 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 07:37 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:40:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> To give people an idea what to expect in the merge window, here are my current >> build and runtime test results. Some of the runtime failures are due to the >> newly introduced i2c bug, but many (including the arm64 boot failures) have >> been around for a while. >> >> Qemu test results: >> total: 96 pass: 69 fail: 27 >> Failed tests: > ... >> powerpc:mpc8544ds:mpc85xx_smp_defconfig >> powerpc:mpc8544ds:mpc85xx_defconfig >> powerpc:smp:ppc64_e5500_defconfig > > These are all an i2c crash, which I assume is the one you mention above. > >> powerpc:nosmp:ppc64_e5500_defconfig > > This seems to be caused by: > > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rcpm.c:32:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_hard_smp_processor_id' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > ie. that driver doesn't build for SMP=n. > Maybe it should include <asm/smp.h> to get the UP definition. Guenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-14 07:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-14 15:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - 2016-03-14 18:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-14 20:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-03-15 01:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-15 03:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-15 06:30 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 23:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-16 01:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-16 14:30 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:30 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-17 03:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-17 03:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected) Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-17 13:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 01:30 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-03-15 07:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 08:00 +0100
csiph-web