Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1354902
| From | "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization |
| Date | 2016-03-10 08:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rb3w5-3HD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r8z97-5Rb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ranQe-5m-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> > This patch set is the QEMU side implementation. > > > > The virtio-balloon is extended so that QEMU can get the free pages > > information from the guest through virtio. > > > > After getting the free pages information (a bitmap), QEMU can use it > > to filter out the guest's free pages in the ram bulk stage. This make > > the live migration process much more efficient. > > > > This RFC version doesn't take the post-copy and RDMA into > > consideration, maybe both of them can benefit from this PV solution by > > with some extra modifications. > > I like the idea, just have to prove (review) and test it a lot to ensure we don't > end up skipping pages that matter. > > However, there are a couple of points: > > In my opinion, the information that's exchanged between the guest and the > host should be exchanged over a virtio-serial channel rather than virtio- > balloon. First, there's nothing related to the balloon here. > It just happens to be memory info. Second, I would never enable balloon in > a guest that I want to be performance-sensitive. So even if you add this as > part of balloon, you'll find no one is using this solution. > > Secondly, I suggest virtio-serial, because it's meant exactly to exchange free- > flowing information between a host and a guest, and you don't need to > extend any part of the protocol for it (hence no changes necessary to the > spec). You can see how spice, vnc, etc., use virtio-serial to exchange data. > > > Amit Hi Amit, Could provide more information on how to use virtio-serial to exchange data? Thread , Wiki or code are all OK. I have not find some useful information yet. Thanks Liang
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> - 2016-03-08 12:20 +0100
RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-03-08 14:20 +0100
RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-03-10 08:50 +0100
Re: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> - 2016-03-10 09:00 +0100
RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-03-10 09:40 +0100
Re: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> - 2016-03-10 12:20 +0100
RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-03-11 03:40 +0100
Re: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> - 2016-03-14 18:10 +0100
RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-03-15 04:40 +0100
Re: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-03-15 11:40 +0100
RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-03-15 12:20 +0100
Re: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> - 2016-03-15 21:00 +0100
RE: [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration optimization "Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com> - 2016-03-16 02:30 +0100
csiph-web