Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1353883
| From | Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net: mvneta: Fix spinlock usage |
| Date | 2016-03-09 09:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <raHce-4Nd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rapp0-XW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rapp0-XW-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <raG6t-49w-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Jisheng,
On mer., mars 09 2016, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote:
> Dear Gregory,
>
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:57:04 +0100 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> In the previous patch, the spinlock was not initialized. While it didn't
>> cause any trouble yet it could be a problem to use it uninitialized.
>>
>> The most annoying part was the critical section protected by the spinlock
>> in mvneta_stop(). Some of the functions could sleep as pointed when
>> activated CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP. Actually, in mvneta_stop() we only
>> need to protect the is_stopped flagged, indeed the code of the notifier
>> for CPU online is protected by the same spinlock, so when we get the
>> lock, the notifer work is done.
>>
>> Reported-by: Patrick Uiterwijk <patrick@puiterwijk.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> index b0ae69f84493..8dc7df2edff6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
>> @@ -3070,17 +3070,17 @@ static int mvneta_stop(struct net_device *dev)
>> struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
>>
>> /* Inform that we are stopping so we don't want to setup the
>> - * driver for new CPUs in the notifiers
>> + * driver for new CPUs in the notifiers. The code of the
>> + * notifier for CPU online is protected by the same spinlock,
>> + * so when we get the lock, the notifer work is done.
>> */
>> spin_lock(&pp->lock);
>> pp->is_stopped = true;
>> + spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
>
> This fix sleep in atomic issue. But
> I see race here. Let's assume is_stopped is false.
You forgot that the lock was hold in the mvneta_percpu_notifier so your
scenario can't happen.
>
> cpu0: cpu1:
> mvneta_percpu_notifier(): mvneta_stop():
>
spin_lock(&pp->lock);
> if (pp->is_stopped) {
> spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
> break;
> }
>
the lock is hold in
mvneta_percpu_notifier(), so as
said in the comment this cpu is
waiting for on the following
line:
spin_lock(&pp->lock);
This code will be executed only
when the lock will be released
> pp->is_stopped = true;
> spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
>
>
> netif_tx_stop_all_queues(pp->dev);
> for_each_online_cpu(other_cpu) {
> ....
>
So what will happen is:
cpu0: cpu1:
mvneta_percpu_notifier(): mvneta_stop():
spin_lock(&pp->lock);
if (pp->is_stopped) {
spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
break;
}
spin_lock(&pp->lock);
netif_tx_stop_all_queues(pp->dev);
for_each_online_cpu(other_cpu) {
....
spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
pp->is_stopped = true;
spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net 0/3] Few mvneta fixes Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-08 14:00 +0100
[PATCH net 3/3] net: mvneta: fix error messages in mvneta_port_down function Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-08 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: mvneta: fix error messages in mvneta_port_down function David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-03-11 20:30 +0100
[PATCH net 1/3] net: mvneta: Fix spinlock usage Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-08 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net: mvneta: Fix spinlock usage Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> - 2016-03-09 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net: mvneta: Fix spinlock usage Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-09 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net: mvneta: Fix spinlock usage Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> - 2016-03-09 09:20 +0100
[PATCH net 2/3] net: mvneta: enable change MAC address when interface is up Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-08 14:00 +0100
csiph-web