Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1451147

RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets

From Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets
Date 2016-07-27 11:30 +0200
Message-ID <rZtk6-5Wg-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rZ2jU-5SK-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZ36h-6p2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZ4F3-7pO-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZeEp-52r-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:45
> To: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> 
> From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:09:41 +0000
> 
> > I googled "S390 hypervisor socket" but didn't find anything related (I think).
> 
> That would be net/iucv/
Thanks for the info! I'll look into this.
 
> There's also VMWare's stuff under net/vmw_vsock
> 
> It's just absolutely rediculous to make a new hypervisor socket
> interface over and over again, so much code duplication and
> replication.
I agree on this principle of avoiding duplication.
However my feeling is: IMHO different hypervisor sockets were developed
independently without coordination and the implementation details could be
so different that an enough generic framework/infrastructure is difficult,
e.g., at first glance, it looks AF_IUCV is quite different from AF_VSOCK and
this might explain why AF_VSOCK wasn't built on AF_IUCV(?).

I'll dig more into AF_IUCV, AF_VSOCK and AF_HYPERV and figure out what
is the best direction I should go.

Thanks,
-- Dexuan

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-07-26 02:40 +0200
  RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 05:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-07-26 06:40 +0200
      RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 07:30 +0200
        RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 09:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> - 2016-07-26 12:00 +0200
            RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 15:30 +0200
              RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 11:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-07-26 19:50 +0200
            RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 11:30 +0200

csiph-web