Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1450383

RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets

From Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets
Date 2016-07-26 07:30 +0200
Message-ID <rZ36h-6p2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rXUy5-5oc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rYYzD-3py-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZ0UN-53b-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rZ2jU-5SK-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
> ...
> From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 03:09:16 +0000
> 
> > BTW, during the past month, at least 7 other people also reviewed
> > the patch and gave me quite a few good comments, which have
> > been addressed.
> 
> Correction: Several people gave coding style and simple corrections
> to your patch.
> 
> Very few gave any review of the _SUBSTANCE_ of your changes.
> 
> And the one of the few who did, and suggested you build your
> facilities using the existing S390 hypervisor socket infrastructure,
> you brushed off _IMMEDIATELY_.
>
> That drives me crazy.  The one person who gave you real feedback
> you basically didn't consider seriously at all.

Hi David,
I'm very sorry -- I guess I must have missed something here -- I don't
remember somebody replied with S390 hypervisor socket
infrastructure... I'm re-reading all the replies, trying to locate the
reply and I'll find out why I didn't take it seriously. Sorry in advance.

> I know why you don't want to consider alternative implementations,
> and it's because you guys have so much invested in what you've
> implemented already.
This is not true. I'm absolutely open to any possibility to have an
alternative better implementation.
Please allow me to find the "S390 hypervisor socket infrastructure" reply
first and I'll report back ASAP.
 
> But that's tough and not our problem.
> 
> And until this changes, yes, this submission will be stuck in the
> mud and continue slogging on like this.

I definitely agree and understand.

Thanks,
-- Dexuan

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-07-26 02:40 +0200
  RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 05:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-07-26 06:40 +0200
      RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 07:30 +0200
        RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 09:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> - 2016-07-26 12:00 +0200
            RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-26 15:30 +0200
              RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 11:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-07-26 19:50 +0200
            RE: [PATCH v18 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> - 2016-07-27 11:30 +0200

csiph-web