Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1449455
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree |
| Date | Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:00:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rYNEd-4FI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rX9fP-7YC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXm3o-7UG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXvzI-5X0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXzDj-hE-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXJMl-72c-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXO9j-1uW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXOsG-1Br-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXOCm-1EM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXOM2-1Io-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXXmh-7eH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-URL | http://acmel.wordpress.com |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 67 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:56:13 -0300 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20160725125613.GL18962@kernel.org> |
| X-Original-References | <20160721092950.0047531e@canb.auug.org.au> <20160721131248.GH18962@kernel.org> <20160722092302.5a0a1544@canb.auug.org.au> <20160722034118.guckaniobf3f7czc@treble> <20160722143739.GI18962@kernel.org> <20160722191920.ej62fnspnqurbaa7@treble> <20160722193655.GJ18962@kernel.org> <20160722194416.pxbsnyhaqcyoigsj@treble> <20160722195734.GK18962@kernel.org> <20160723150845.3af8e452@canb.auug.org.au> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1449455 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Em Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 03:08:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:57:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > I applied your patch and will push it to Ingo, now we must cross our > > fingers so that Stephen doesn't come back to us once more telling it is > > still broken :o) > Unfortunately, this is what I get when I just build perf/core: > DESCEND objtool > CC /home/sfr/next/x86_64_allmodconfig/tools/objtool/builtin-check.o Cool! objtool is fixed, we're not at a different tool using those headers, and your patch fixes it, I see Andy acked it, I'll merge this and push to Ingo, Thanks, - Arnaldo > LD /home/sfr/next/x86_64_allmodconfig/tools/objtool/objtool-in.o > Warning: objtool: x86 instruction decoder differs from kernel > LINK /home/sfr/next/x86_64_allmodconfig/tools/objtool/objtool > In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h:10:0, > from /home/sfr/next/next/include/uapi/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:11, > from /home/sfr/next/next/include/uapi/asm-generic/types.h:6, > from /home/sfr/next/next/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/types.h:4, > from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/types.h:9, > from /home/sfr/next/next/include/uapi/linux/elf.h:4, > from /home/sfr/next/next/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.c:66: > /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:13:2: error: #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h > #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h > ^ > > The be clear: this is a ppc64le hosted, x86_64 target cross build. > > I than added the following patch, and the build finishes successfully. > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 14:35:40 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] x86: make the vdso2c compiler use the host architecture > headers > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > --- > arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile > index 253b72eaade6..25e88c030c47 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ VDSO_LDFLAGS_vdso.lds = -m64 -Wl,-soname=linux-vdso.so.1 \ > $(obj)/vdso64.so.dbg: $(src)/vdso.lds $(vobjs) FORCE > $(call if_changed,vdso) > > -HOST_EXTRACFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/include -I$(srctree)/include/uapi -I$(srctree)/arch/x86/include/uapi > +HOST_EXTRACFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/include -I$(srctree)/include/uapi -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SUBARCH)/include/uapi > hostprogs-y += vdso2c > > quiet_cmd_vdso2c = VDSO2C $@ > -- > 2.8.1 > > There may be a more correct way to do this ... > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-15 09:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 09:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 09:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 17:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 17:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 17:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-07-15 22:30 +0200
[PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-18 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-18 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-18 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-19 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-19 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-19 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-20 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-20 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-20 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-20 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-20 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-20 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-21 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-22 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-22 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-22 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-22 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-23 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-24 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 15:00 +0200
[tip:perf/core] x86: Make the vdso2c compiler use the host architecture headers tip-bot for Stephen Rothwell <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-25 20:20 +0200
[tip:perf/core] tools build: Fix objtool build with ARCH=x86_64 tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-25 20:20 +0200
[tip:perf/core] objtool: Always use host headers tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-25 20:20 +0200
[tip:perf/core] tools: Simplify BITS_PER_LONG define tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-16 22:50 +0200
csiph-web