Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree

From	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree
Date	2016-07-15 17:50 +0200
Message-ID	<rVdxf-dW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <rV5Jn-40F-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rV5T4-43Z-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVcUx-8sw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVddT-7n-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVdxf-dW-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:43:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack?

Sure. Although I'm still somewhat puzzled by the duplicated effort of
__BITS_PER_LONG and BITS_PER_LONG.

> commit a08cc3e6f7bb965672a3ff60f98d0dbbc5334ee7
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date:   Fri Jul 15 12:38:18 2016 -0300
> 
>     tools: Simplify BITS_PER_LONG define
>     
>     Do it using (__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_LONG__), simpler, works everywhere,
>     reduces the complexity by ditching CONFIG_64BIT, that was being
>     synthesized from yet another set of defines, which proved fragile,
>     breaking the build on linux-next for no obvious reasons.

If you ever do need to introduce CONFIG_64BIT, __LP64__ seems like the
right symbol to use for it.

Thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-15 09:10 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 09:30 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 09:40 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 17:10 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 17:30 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 17:30 +0200
            Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 18:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-15 17:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 18:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-07-15 22:30 +0200
          [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-15 17:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-18 07:20 +0200
              Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-18 22:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-18 22:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-19 00:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 01:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-19 02:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 02:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-19 05:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 15:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 19:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-20 01:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-20 02:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-20 05:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-07-20 05:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-20 05:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-20 05:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-21 01:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 15:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-22 01:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 05:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-22 16:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 21:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-22 21:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-22 21:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-22 22:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-23 07:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-24 20:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the  luto-misc tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 15:00 +0200
                [tip:perf/core] x86: Make the vdso2c compiler use the host  architecture headers tip-bot for Stephen Rothwell <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-25 20:20 +0200
                [tip:perf/core] tools build: Fix objtool build with ARCH=x86_64 tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-25 20:20 +0200
                [tip:perf/core] objtool: Always use host headers tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-25 20:20 +0200
    [tip:perf/core] tools: Simplify BITS_PER_LONG define tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-07-16 22:50 +0200

csiph-web