Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1449439
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree |
| Date | 2016-07-25 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rYMRP-4pv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rV0Tn-ZV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVaSK-70X-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVYPv-46h-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWt6W-6qm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rWucF-76K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: > >> > Well, not knowing much about ACPI, I just need the conflict resolution >> > for my latest i2c/for-next and your above branch. If you want to do it, >> > fine with me. But maybe Jarkko will be back to office on Monday, too. >> >> Unfortunately, I don't see how these branches can be merged in a sensible >> way without adding too much new code into the merge itself. >> >> Something needs to be dropped and then rebased and applied again. > > Okay, I'll drop the I2C parts. Next to the core parts which I will drop, > there was also a driver patch making use of the core changes for which I > requested some updates. Since those did not happen yet (Jarkko on > holiday?), the core patches alone are not important anyhow. Jarkko and Mika are on holidays, I recently noticed this thread, sorry. For now your solution seems okay, since we can't push broken parts into v4.8-rc1. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-15 04:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-15 04:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-15 14:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-15 14:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-15 14:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-15 15:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-17 20:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-19 04:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-19 05:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-19 15:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 14:10 +0200
csiph-web