Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1445070
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree |
| Date | 2016-07-17 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rVYPv-46h-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rV0Tn-ZV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVag2-6Nq-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVazo-6Uc-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVaSK-70X-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
> > > > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can > > > > > > > > For a start, it generates this warning, now: > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20: warning: 'i2c_acpi_add_device' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > > > static acpi_status i2c_acpi_add_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, > > > > ^ > > > > > > OK, thanks for the heads-up. > > > > Yes, thanks! > > > > > > > > Wolfram, what about if I exposed my "acpi-tables" branch for you to pull? > > > > > > You could resolve this in your tree then. > > > > I can pull it in, sure. For the fixup, I'd like a commitment from one of > > the ACPI experts (Jarkko, Mika, Andy), though. Otherwise I'd need to > > revert given that we are quite late in the cycle already. > > The branch is here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git acpi-tables > > The top-most commit is: > > fafe5306f201 ACPI: Rename configfs.c to acpi_configfs.c to prevent link error > > I won't rebase this branch going forward, so it is safe to pull. > > Please let me know how I can help with the conflict resolution. Well, not knowing much about ACPI, I just need the conflict resolution for my latest i2c/for-next and your above branch. If you want to do it, fine with me. But maybe Jarkko will be back to office on Monday, too.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-15 04:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-15 04:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-15 14:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-15 14:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-15 14:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-15 15:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-17 20:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-19 04:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-19 05:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-19 15:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 14:10 +0200
csiph-web