Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1447953
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants |
| Date | 2016-07-21 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rXnLP-DS-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <rX8Wt-7Sc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rX8Wu-7Sc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXgU1-4ur-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXniN-cH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rXniN-cH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, Aleksa. On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:37:42AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > > Ths is of course solvable using something like libpam-cgfs or > > libpam-cgm (and others). Since this sounds like a question of > > policy, not mechanism, userspace seems like the right place. Is > > there a downside to that (or, as Tejun put it, "delegating explicitly")? > > Having a PAM module requires getting an administrator to install the PAM > module (and also presumably audit it, not to mention convincing them that > your requirement to use containers are significant enough for them to do any > work). It's the same problem IMO. I understand that LXC allows you to do > this, but it requires that you get an administrator to *install* and support > LXC (as well as the shadow-utils setuid binaries too). There are cases where > you don't have the freedom to do that, and also "just get someone to give > you privileges temporarily" is again punting on the problem. The administrator has to install a new kernel to get this feature from kernel side too. I don't think "to bypass admin" is a strong argument for a new kernel feature especially when it's likely to cause subtle issues as in this case. Thanks. -- tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v1 0/3] cgroup: allow for unprivileged management Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-18 18:20 +0200
[PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-18 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-20 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-21 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-21 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-21 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-21 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-21 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-21 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-21 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-21 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-21 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-21 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-21 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-21 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-22 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de> - 2016-07-22 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] cgroup: relax common ancestor restriction for direct descendants Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-25 20:50 +0200
csiph-web