Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1445288
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] mem-hotplug: use different mempolicy in alloc_migrate_target() |
| Date | 2016-07-18 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rWbMK-3DS-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rV1mp-1b8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rV1wf-1ey-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 07/15/2016 04:51 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> When we offline a node, the new page should alloced from other
> nodes instead of the current node, because re-migrate is a waste of
> time.
Ugh, I'm surprised that it's not the case already. Maybe the allocation
from same node is already prevented indirectly somehow?
> So use prefer mempolicy for hotplug, use default mempolicy for cma.
IMHO CMA should prefer the same node as the migrated page, if anything.
Current task's mempolicy shouldn't restrict it (it's likely migrating
pages of somebody else) or even guide its preferences. Ideally it would
keep the original page's mempolicy, but we can't afford to track that...
> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/page-isolation.h | 2 +-
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 ++++-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> mm/page_isolation.c | 8 +++++---
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> index 047d647..c163de3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ undo_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages);
>
> -struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private,
> +struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long nid,
> int **resultp);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index e3cbdca..b5963bf 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1510,12 +1510,15 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> int move_pages = NR_OFFLINE_AT_ONCE_PAGES;
> int not_managed = 0;
> int ret = 0;
> + int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> LIST_HEAD(source);
>
> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn && move_pages > 0; pfn++) {
> if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> continue;
> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + nid = next_node_in(page_to_nid(page), node_online_map);
>
> if (PageHuge(page)) {
> struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> @@ -1568,7 +1571,7 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> * alloc_migrate_target should be improooooved!!
So, is this patch improooooving it enough that we can delete the
comment? If not, could the patch be improooooved? :)
> * migrate_pages returns # of failed pages.
> */
> - ret = migrate_pages(&source, alloc_migrate_target, NULL, 0,
> + ret = migrate_pages(&source, alloc_migrate_target, NULL, nid,
> MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_HOTPLUG);
> if (ret)
> putback_movable_pages(&source);
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 6903b69..b99f1c2 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7322,7 +7322,7 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct compact_control *cc,
> cc->nr_migratepages -= nr_reclaimed;
>
> ret = migrate_pages(&cc->migratepages, alloc_migrate_target,
> - NULL, 0, cc->mode, MR_CMA);
> + NULL, NUMA_NO_NODE, cc->mode, MR_CMA);
> }
> if (ret < 0) {
> putback_movable_pages(&cc->migratepages);
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index 4f32c9f..f471be6 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -279,18 +279,20 @@ int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> return pfn < end_pfn ? -EBUSY : 0;
> }
>
> -struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private,
> +struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long nid,
> int **resultp)
> {
> /*
> - * TODO: allocate a destination hugepage from a nearest neighbor node,
> + * hugeTLB: allocate a destination page from a nearest neighbor node,
for hugeTLB it's still a TODO, by removing the word the rest of comment
doesn't make much sense
> * accordance with memory policy of the user process if possible. For
> * now as a simple work-around, we use the next node for destination.
> + * Normal page: use prefer mempolicy for destination if called by
> + * hotplug, use default mempolicy for destination if called by cma.
> */
> if (PageHuge(page))
> return alloc_huge_page_node(page_hstate(compound_head(page)),
> next_node_in(page_to_nid(page),
> node_online_map));
> else
> - return alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
> + return alloc_pages_node(nid, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, 0);
> }
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-07-15 04:50 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] mem-hotplug: use different mempolicy in alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-07-15 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] mem-hotplug: use different mempolicy in alloc_migrate_target() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-07-18 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-07-18 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-07-18 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-07-18 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-07-18 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-07-18 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-07-19 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-07-19 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mem-hotplug: use GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in, alloc_migrate_target() David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2016-07-19 21:10 +0200
csiph-web