Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1446348

Re: Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8?

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:47:39PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
> 
> There are four core patches needed for the THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK thing,
> and they apply cleanly to -mm now.  The x86 patch to flip the feature
> on does not apply cleanly anywhere because it depends on changes in
> -tip *and* in -mm.  I'd like to get all of this as well as the rest of
> the vmap-stacks stuff in by 4.9, but I'm wondering if it might make
> sense to get the core THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK stuff into -mm for 4.8
> instead.
> 
> Pros:
>  - It reduces the amount of core code that -tip will have to carry until 4.9.
>  - It may benefit other architectures.  Christian Borntraeger
> expressed an interest in enabling the feature for s390, but it'll be
> awkward for him until the core bit landed.  Similarly, arm64 seems to
> be interested.

This would probably be useful for arm64.

There's still a reasonable amount to figure out (e.g. [1,2]), so from my
PoV this is a nice-to-have, but there's no pressure.

Thanks,
Mark.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/11/193
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/11/483

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8? Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-07-19 01:50 +0200
  Re: Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8? Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-07-19 10:30 +0200
    Re: Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8? Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-07-25 16:30 +0200
  Re: Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8? Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-07-19 13:30 +0200
  Re: Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8? Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-07-20 09:50 +0200

csiph-web