Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1444788

Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference

From Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference
Date 2016-07-16 11:10 +0200
Message-ID <rVtLI-1SI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rVlO9-5j4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVlO9-5j4-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


I like the Fixes tag because it was my invention.  :)  It's a separate
thing from -stable.

It's nice for reviewing so you can see the original intent of the patch
you're fixing.  Also it forces you to find the original authors and CC
them so hopefully they Ack the patch.  The other thing is it lets you
collect data about which patches introduce bugs and how quickly they
get fixed.  So for example, lwn.net recently had an article about bug
that are backported into the -stable tree.

regards,
dan carpenter

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 02:40 +0200
  Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-07-16 02:50 +0200
    Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 03:50 +0200
  Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-07-16 11:10 +0200
    Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 06:00 +0200

csiph-web