Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1442176
| From | Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/34] mm, vmscan: have kswapd only scan based on the highest requested zone |
| Date | 2016-07-13 10:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUnS2-vb-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rSAqm-2Tv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSAqm-2Tv-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rU6xQ-5Z5-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:05:04AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:34:42AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > kswapd checks all eligible zones to see if they need balancing even if it > > was woken for a lower zone. This made sense when we reclaimed on a > > per-zone basis because we wanted to shrink zones fairly so avoid > > age-inversion problems. Ideally this is completely unnecessary when > > reclaiming on a per-node basis. In theory, there may still be anomalies > > when all requests are for lower zones and very old pages are preserved in > > higher zones but this should be the exceptional case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> > > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> > > I wasn't quite sure at first what the rationale is for this patch, > since it probably won't make much difference in pratice. Possibly not, it depends on how much embedded 32-bit platforms use features like zswap. What I wanted to avoid was a lowmem allocation for zswap excessively reclaiming highmem putting even further pressure on zswap if the pages are anonymous. > But I do > agree that the code is cleaner to have kswapd check exactly what it > was asked to check, rather than some do-the-"right"-thing magic. > But this is a justification on its own. I encountered an astonishing number of magic number handling that just happened to mostly work. I wanted to iron them out as much as possible. > A hypothetical onslaught of low-zone allocations will wreak havoc to > the page age in higher zones anyway, right? So I don't think that case > matters all that much. Possibly not, but it was straight-forward to mitigate the damage without too many side-effects. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 06/34] mm, vmscan: have kswapd only scan based on the highest requested zone Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-07-12 16:10 +0200 Re: [PATCH 06/34] mm, vmscan: have kswapd only scan based on the highest requested zone Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2016-07-13 10:40 +0200
csiph-web