Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1443573

Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module

From Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module
Date 2016-07-14 18:30 +0200
Message-ID <rURGp-3xe-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rURn4-3qz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rURwJ-3tZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hello Casey,

On 07/14/2016 12:17 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/14/2016 9:00 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The IS_ENABLED() macro checks if a Kconfig symbol has been enabled either
>> built-in or as a module, use that macro instead of open coding the same.
> 
> Why?
> 

Why not? We have a macro for this so why is better to open coding it?

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-07-14 18:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2016-07-14 18:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-07-14 18:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2016-07-14 18:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-07-14 22:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2016-07-14 23:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> - 2016-07-15 00:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for  built-in or module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-07-15 13:40 +0200

csiph-web