Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1440435
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] sched: Store maximum per-cpu capacity in root domain |
| Date | 2016-07-11 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rTGtH-5FU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rMTP3-6im-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMTP3-6im-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -6905,11 +6906,19 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
> /* Attach the domains */
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> + rq = cpu_rq(i);
> sd = *per_cpu_ptr(d.sd, i);
> cpu_attach_domain(sd, d.rd, i);
> +
> + if (rq->cpu_capacity_orig > rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity)
> + rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity = rq->cpu_capacity_orig;
> }
Should you not set that _before_ cpu_attach_domain(), such that the
state is up-to-date when its published?
Also, since its lockless, should we not use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() with it?
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> + if (rq)
> + pr_info("span: %*pbl (max cpu_capacity = %lu)\n",
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map), rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity);
> +
While a single statement, it is multi line, please add brackets.
> ret = 0;
> error:
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] sched: Store maximum per-cpu capacity in root domain Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-11 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] sched: Store maximum per-cpu capacity in root domain Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2016-07-11 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] sched: Store maximum per-cpu capacity in root domain Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-12 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] sched: Store maximum per-cpu capacity in root domain Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2016-07-13 13:30 +0200
csiph-web