Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1438906
| From | James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? |
| Date | 2016-07-07 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rSn05-2Gq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <rRVQd-1PF-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rScHp-4lY-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <rShH4-7v8-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSj6a-cB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSmdH-275-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 20:21 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On 7 July 2016 at 17:01, James Bottomley > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: [Serge already answered the parenting issue] > > On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 08:36 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Hm. Probably best-effort based on the process hierarchy. So > > > yeah you could probably get a tree into a state that would be > > > wrongly recreated. Create a new netns, bind mount it, exit; Have > > > another task create a new user_ns, bind mount it, exit; Third > > > task setns()s first to the new netns then to the new user_ns. I > > > suspect criu will recreate that wrongly. > > > > This is a bit pathological, and you have to be root to do it: so > > root can set up a nesting hierarchy, bind it and destroy the pids > > but I know of no current orchestration system which does this. > > > > Actually, I have to back pedal a bit: the way I currently set up > > architecture emulation containers does precisely this: I set up the > > namespaces unprivileged with child mount namespaces, but then I ask > > root to bind the userns and kill the process that created it so I > > have a permanent handle to enter the namespace by, so I suspect > > that when our current orchestration systems get more sophisticated, > > they might eventually want to do something like this as well. > > > > In theory, we could get nsfs to show this information as an option > > (just add a show_options entry to the superblock ops), but the > > problem is that although each namespace has a parent user_ns, > > there's no way to get it without digging in the namespace specific > > structure. Probably we should restructure to move it into > > ns_common, then we could display it (and enforce all namespaces > > having owning user_ns) but it would be a > > I'm missing something here. Is it not already the case that all > namespaces have an owning user_ns? Um, yes, I don't believe I said they don't. The problem I thought you were having is that there's no way of seeing what it is. nsfs is the Namespace fileystem where bound namespaces appear to a cat of /proc/self/mounts. It can display any information that's in ns_common (the common core of namespaces) but the owning user_ns pointer currently isn't in this structure. Every user namespace has a pointer to it, but they're all privately embedded in the individual namespace specific structures. What I was proposing was that since every current namespace has a pointer somewhere to the owning user namespace, we could abstract this out into ns_common so it's now accessible to be displayed by nsfs, probably as a mount option. James
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 10:50 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-06 16:20 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-06 18:00 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-08 10:00 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-08 16:40 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-07-08 23:00 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@Hansenpartnership.com> - 2016-07-09 00:30 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@Hansenpartnership.com> - 2016-07-09 00:30 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-09 02:10 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-09 02:20 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-09 05:20 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@Hansenpartnership.com> - 2016-07-09 12:40 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@Hansenpartnership.com> - 2016-07-09 12:40 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-09 20:30 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-09 20:50 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 10:20 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-07 15:40 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-07 17:10 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 20:30 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> - 2016-07-07 20:30 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-07 21:20 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-08 05:30 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-07-08 07:40 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-07-08 08:20 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-07-08 09:20 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 07:50 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 07:50 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-08 08:20 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 13:20 +0200
Re: [CRIU] Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-07-08 05:30 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 13:20 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-07-09 05:20 +0200
Re: Introspecting userns relationships to other namespaces? ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2016-07-09 05:30 +0200
csiph-web