Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1438716
| From | Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] x86: remove LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() |
| Date | 2016-07-07 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rSkvf-ZX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rS6LD-dY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSk2d-Ok-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:01:49AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > The setup for LTO never made it upstream, and although this has > some users, this is now really old stuff for a gcc 4.7 LTO problem. > We know that at least LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() work around can > be removed if LTO is not supported on v4.7 anymore. > > As per Andi the DISABLE_LTO and LTO_CFLAGS are still neeeded though. Looks good. Thanks Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> -Andi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed? "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-06-24 01:40 +0200
Re: Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed? Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-06-24 23:10 +0200
Re: Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed? "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-06-28 02:50 +0200
[PATCH] x86: remove LTO flags "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-07-07 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86: remove LTO flags Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-07-07 04:00 +0200
[PATCH v2] x86: remove LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-07-07 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] x86: remove LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-07-07 18:40 +0200
csiph-web