Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1430242

Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed?

From "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed?
Date 2016-06-24 01:40 +0200
Message-ID <rNmo1-it-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Andi,

is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCAL() still needed?

I see external stuff like this:

https://github.com/neo-technologies/linux-next/blob/master/scripts/Makefile.lto

But nothing quite obviously setting these upstream. I'm probably just
missing something obvious though. Either way I figured now would be a
good time to ask as I have other code that would use this, the linker
table stuff I've been working. If we can avoid propagating more use of
LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() then great. If we still need it its probably
good to document this a bit more as can't see anything super clear.

  Luis

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed? "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-06-24 01:40 +0200
  Re: Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed? Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-06-24 23:10 +0200
    Re: Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed? "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-06-28 02:50 +0200
      [PATCH] x86: remove LTO flags "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-07-07 02:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] x86: remove LTO flags Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-07-07 04:00 +0200
          [PATCH v2] x86: remove LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2016-07-07 18:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v2] x86: remove LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-07-07 18:40 +0200

csiph-web