Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1439562

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()

From Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
Date 2016-07-08 17:20 +0200
Message-ID <rSFJn-6un-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rSD4S-4Jb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSENk-5T8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rSFzH-6qY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:06:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.07.16 at 16:17, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:21:52AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> For single items being collected this should be preferred as being more
> >> typesafe (as the compiler can check format string and to-be-written-to
> >> variable match) and more efficient (requiring one less parameter to be
> >> passed).
> >> 
> >> 1: xenbus: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
> >> 2: xen-blkback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
> >> 3: xen-blkfront: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
> >> 4: xen-netback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> >> ---
> >> v2: Avoid commit messages to continue from subjects. Group into a series.
> > 
> > To confuse this, Roger and I are the block sub-maintainers, which
> > when we are happy, I send to Jens, while the rest go through Boris,David, 
> > and Juergen.
> 
> Which is why originally I had sent all of these separately. Yet David
> was pretty unhappy about that.

Aye!
I am not critizing, just saying that this is getting complicated and you
are in the unfortunate situation to have to deal with this - so want
to apoligize for you having to go through this gauntlet.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather() "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-07-08 14:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 3/4] xen-blkfront: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-07-08 14:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 1/4] xenbus: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-07-08 14:30 +0200
  [PATCH v2 2/4] xen-blkback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-07-08 14:30 +0200
  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2016-07-08 16:20 +0200
    Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-07-08 17:10 +0200
      Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2016-07-08 17:20 +0200
    Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2016-07-08 17:50 +0200
      Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over  xenbus_gather() Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2016-07-08 18:00 +0200

csiph-web